7.8.6. Graph-based Full Event Interpretation#
Author: J. Cerasoli
The Graph-based Full Event Interpretation (graFEI) is a machine learning tool based on deep Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) to
inclusively reconstruct events in Belle II using information on the final state particles only,
without any prior assumptions about the structure of the underlying decay chain.
GNNs are a particular class of neural networks acting on graphs.
Graphs are entities composed of a set of nodes \(V=\{v_{i}\}_{i=1}^N`\)
connected by edges \(E = \{e_{v_{i} v_{j}} \equiv e_{ij}\}_{i \neq j}\).
You can find a brief description of the model in the documentation of the GraFEIModel
class.
See also
The model is described in these proceedings. This work is based on ‘Learning tree structures from leaves for particle decay reconstruction’ by Kahn et al. Please consider citing both papers. Part of the code is adapted from the work of Kahn et al (available here). A detailed description of the model is also available in this Belle II internal note (restricted access).
The network is trained to predict the mass hypotheses of final state particles and the Lowest Common Ancestor (LCA) matrix of the event. Each element of the LCA matrix contains the lowest ancestor common to a pair of final state particles. To avoid the use of a unique identifier for each ancestor, a system of classes is used: 6 for \(\Upsilon (4S)\) resonances, 5 for \(B^{\pm,0}\) mesons, 4 for \({D^{*}_{(s)}}^{\pm, 0}\), 3 for \(D^{\pm,0}\), 2 for \(K_{s}^{0}\), 1 for \(\pi^{0}`\) or \(J/\psi\) and 0 for particles not belonging to the decay tree. This new representation of the LCA is called LCAS matrix, where the S stands for “stage”. An example of decay tree with its corresponding LCAS matrix is:
The model can be trained and evaluated in two modes:
\(\Upsilon (4S)\) reconstruction mode: the model is trained to reconstruct the LCAS matrix of the whole event, i.e. the maximum depth of the LCAS matrix is 6;
\(B\) reconstruction mode: the model is trained to reconstruct single \(B\) decays, i.e. the maximum depth of the LCAS matrix is 5. In this case, when applying the model to some data, a signal-side must be reconstructed first, and the graFEI is used to reconstruct the rest-of-event.
Model training#
The graFEI code is contained in analysis/scripts/grafei
.
The model is trained with ROOT
ntuples produced with the steering file grafei/scripts/create_training_files.py
(you may want to modify this file with your own cuts).
The file requires the argument -t
to be set to either B+
, B0
or Ups
for \(B^{+}\), \(B^{0}\) or \(\Upsilon (4S)\) reconstruction respectively.
This is the only place where you specify which reconstruction mode you wish to perform: the code will figure it out automatically in later steps.
The output files used for training and evaluation must be placed in the folders root/train
and root/val
respectively, where root
is a folder of your choice.
The training is performed with the python script grafei/scripts/train_model.py
. It requires a .yaml
config file with the -c
argument.
You can find a prototype of config file at analysis/data/grafei_config.yaml
, where all options are documented.
The training outputs a copy of the config file used and a weight file in the format .pt
that can be used to apply the model to some other data.
The output folder is defined in the config file.
Note
Example of running create_training_file.py
:
basf2 create_training_file.py -i PATH/TO/SOMENTUPLE.mdst -n 1000 -- -t Ups
Example of running train_model.py
:
python3 train_model.py -c PATH/TO/SOMECONFIG.yaml
The loss function is of the form
where \(\alpha\) is a parameter tunable in the config file.
Applying the model to data#
The model .yaml
and .pt
output files can be saved to a payload with the script grafei/scripts/save_model_to_payload.py
and uploaded to a global tag in order to run on the grid.
Finally, the model can be included in a steering file via the graFEI
wrapper function,
in order to apply the model to Belle II data and MC.
Example of steering files for \(B\) and \(\Upsilon (4S)\) reconstruction modes are available in analysis/examples/GraFEI
.
In both cases the LCAS matrix is not directly saved in the final ntuples, but several variables labelled with the prefix graFEI_
are available.
When using the model in \(\Upsilon (4S)\) reconstruction mode you have also the possibility of specifying an LCAS matrix (in the form of a nested list) and a list
of mass hypotheses (following the convention outlined in the select_good_decay
class) for your signal-side: in the case where the predicted LCAS matrix describes a valid tree structure,
the code checks if a subset of particles in the tree matches the given LCAS and mass hypotheses
(the ordering of the final state particles does not matter because all the permutations are checked, however the mass hypotheses and the LCAS rows/columns should match).
If so, the graFEI_goodEvent
variable is set to 1. This allows to get rid of badly reconstructed events.
If you pass a list of particle lists as input to the model (more information in the graFEI
documentation) the mass hypotheses of final state particles
are updated to match those predicted by the model and stored in new particle lists called PART:graFEI
.
In this case you can construct signal- and tag-side candidates with the following lines of code (as documented in the example):
charged_types = ["e+", "mu+", "pi+", "K+", "p+"]
particle_types = charged_types + ["gamma"]
# Define sig-side B -> K+ (nu nu)
ma.reconstructDecay(
f"B+:sgn -> K+:graFEI",
"daughter(0, extraInfo(graFEI_sigSide)) == 1",
path=path,
)
# Define tag-side B
for part in particle_types:
ma.cutAndCopyList(
f"{part}:Btag",
f"{part}:graFEI",
cut="extraInfo(graFEI_sigSide) == 0",
writeOut=True,
path=path,
)
ma.combineAllParticles([f"{part}:Btag" for part in particle_types], "B+:Btag", path=path)
ma.reconstructDecay("Upsilon(4S):neutral -> B+:Bsgn B-:Btag",
"",
path=path)
ma.reconstructDecay("Upsilon(4S):charged -> B+:Bsgn B+:Btag",
"",
allowChargeViolation=True,
path=path)
ma.copyLists(
"Upsilon(4S):graFEI",
[
"Upsilon(4S):neutral",
"Upsilon(4S):charged",
],
path=path,
)
The extraInfo(graFEI_sigSide)
is set to 1 for particles predicted to belong to the signal-side, 0 for particles predicted to belong to the tag-side
and -1 for particles in events with graFEI_goodEvent = 0
. Therefore, if you want meaningful distributions you should cut on events with graFEI_goodEvent = 1
.
However, if you reconstruct the signal-side as in the example, only good events are kept.
The variables added by the GraFEI are filled with nan
if there are less than two reconstructed particles in the event.
Otherwise, they are defined as follows:
Variable |
Description |
---|---|
|
Discriminating variable obtained as the product of predicted edge class probabilities in the event. |
|
Discriminating variable obtained as the arithmetic mean of predicted edge class probabilities in the event. |
|
Discriminating variable obtained as the geometric mean of predicted edge class probabilities in the event. |
|
1 for valid tree structures, 0 otherwise. |
|
1 for events having a correctly reconstructed signal-side, 0 otherwise (\(\Upsilon (4S)\) reconstruction mode only). |
|
Number of reconstructed final state particles in the event. |
|
Number of reconstructed charged particles in the event, according to mass hypotheses assigned with likelihood functions. |
|
Number of reconstructed photons in the event, according to mass hypotheses assigned with likelihood functions. |
|
Number of reconstructed electrons in the event, according to mass hypotheses assigned with likelihood functions. |
|
Number of reconstructed muons in the event, according to mass hypotheses assigned with likelihood functions. |
|
Number of reconstructed pions in the event, according to mass hypotheses assigned with likelihood functions. |
|
Number of reconstructed kaons in the event, according to mass hypotheses assigned with likelihood functions. |
|
Number of reconstructed protons in the event, according to mass hypotheses assigned with likelihood functions. |
|
Number of reconstructed leptons in the event, according to mass hypotheses assigned with likelihood functions. |
|
Number of other reconstructed particles in the event, according to mass hypotheses assigned with likelihood functions. |
|
Number of reconstructed charged particles in the event, according to mass hypotheses assigned with the graFEI model. |
|
Number of reconstructed photons in the event, according to mass hypotheses assigned with the graFEI model. |
|
Number of reconstructed electrons in the event, according to mass hypotheses assigned with the graFEI model. |
|
Number of reconstructed muons in the event, according to mass hypotheses assigned with the graFEI model. |
|
Number of reconstructed pions in the event, according to mass hypotheses assigned with the graFEI model. |
|
Number of reconstructed kaons in the event, according to mass hypotheses assigned with the graFEI model. |
|
Number of reconstructed protons in the event, according to mass hypotheses assigned with the graFEI model. |
|
Number of reconstructed leptons in the event, according to mass hypotheses assigned with the graFEI model. |
|
Number of other reconstructed particles in the event, according to mass hypotheses assigned with the graFEI model. |
|
Number of reconstructed particles predicted as being “unmatched” by the model, i.e. the corresponding line in the LCAS matrix is filled with 0’s. |
|
Number of reconstructed particles predicted as being “unmatched” by the model, excluding photons. |
|
Truth-matching variable: 1 if LCAS matrix of the event if perfectly reconstructed, 0 otherwise. |
|
Truth-matching variable: 1 if all mass hypotheses in the event are perfectly assigned, 0 otherwise. |
|
Truth-matching variable: logical |
|
Truth-matching variable: 1 if a neutrino is present in the true underlying decay chain, 0 if not present, -1 if no decay chain can be matched to the event. |
|
Truth-matching variable: number of final state particles in the true underlying decay chain, -1 if no decay chain can be matched to the event. |
|
Truth-matching variable: number of final state particles matched to true photons. |
|
Truth-matching variable: number of final state particles matched to true electrons. |
|
Truth-matching variable: number of final state particles matched to true muons. |
|
Truth-matching variable: number of final state particles matched to true pions. |
|
Truth-matching variable: number of final state particles matched to true kaons. |
|
Truth-matching variable: number of final state particles matched to true protons. |
|
Truth-matching variable: number of final state particles matched to true other particles. |
Code documentation#
This section describes the grafei code.
Core modules#
If you want to use a custom steering file to create training data, you can import the LCASaverModule
with from grafei import lcaSaver
.
You can import the core GraFEIModule
in a steering file with from grafei import graFEI
.
These are wrapper functions that internally call the modules and add them to the basf2 path.
Other modules and functions#
Here the core code of the graFEI is described. This section is intended for developers, users usually do not need to manipulate these components.