21.4.8. Full Event Interpretation¶
Introduction¶
In each ϒ(4S) decay at Belle II, two B mesons are produced. If one of the B mesons decays to a final state involving neutrinos, this B meson cannot be reconstructed completely as the neutrinos are invisible to the detector. The information can, however, be recovered from the second B meson. This is called tagging, the second B meson is referred to as Btag. The Full Event Interpretation (FEI; pronounced like phi) is an algorithm which reconstructs this Btag in roughly 10 000 channels. It uses a hierarchical approach to do so, first reconstructing low-level particles such as Kaons and Pions, then intermediate D mesons and finally B mesons. At each stage, the most-likely particle candidates are selected using multivariate classifiers and then used for the next stage. Usually, we do not have to train these classifiers ourselves as this requires large computing resources. Instead, the classifiers are pre-trained and can be loaded from a central database.
Fortunately, for you as a user this is all contained within a few lines of code, allowing you to easily include the FEI in your steering file. In the first part of this exercise, we will use the FEI to reconstruct a B+tag and have a look at its properties. In the second part we will combine the Btag with a B meson reconstructed in a decay channel involving neutrinos, referred to as Bsig.
Exercise
Find the documentation of the FEI and look up “hadronic tagging” and “semileptonic tagging”. What is the difference between both analysis strategies? What are advantages and disadvantages?
Hint
The documentation can be found in the Advanced Topics section of the analysis module.
The definitions can be found in the section titled Hadronic, Semileptonic and Inclusive Tagging
.
Solution
The documentation is here: Full event interpretation
Hadronic tagging uses only B meson decays without neutrinos and is therefore more precise (as the exact momentum of the B meson can be known).
Semileptonic tagging uses decays that include one neutrino, these have higher branching fractions but are less precise as the kinematic information is incomplete.
In this exercise we will use hadronic tagging, the procedure for semileptonic tagging is analogous but as it is less commonly used it is not discussed in this exercise.
Reconstructing a B+tag¶
Prerequisites¶
As usual, we start our steering file by importing the necessary python packages,
creating a basf2 path and loading input data.
In addition to the usual python packages (basf2
and modularAnalysis
) we also import the fei
package.
Exercise
Import basf2
, modularAnalysis
and fei
.
In addition, we will be using variable aliases so be sure to import the variable manager.
Then create a path and
load input data from an mdst
file.
You can again use mdst files from /group/belle2/users/tenchini/prerelease-05-00-00a/charged/
on KEKCC.
Solution
#!/usr/bin/env python3
import sys
import basf2 as b2
import fei
import modularAnalysis as ma
from variables import variables as vm
# get input file number from the command line
filenumber = sys.argv[1]
# create path
main = b2.Path()
# load input data from mdst/udst file
ma.inputMdst(
environmentType="default",
filename=b2.find_file(f"starterkit/2021/1111540100_eph3_BGx0_{filenumber}.root", "examples"),
path=main,
)
Now we need the Global Tag in which the weight files for the FEI can be found. This can change once a new central training of the FEI is released so it is best to use the b2conditionsdb-recommend tool with the mdst file as argument.
The correct Global Tag must then be used in your steering file by assigning it
to the conditions.globaltags
list in the basf2
namespace.
Exercise
Look up the correct Global Tag for our mdst file using b2conditionsdb-recommend.
The command will return multiple Global Tags, choose the one starting with analysis_tools
as this one contains the weight files of the FEI.
Include the Global Tag in your steering file.
Hint
Execute
b2conditionsdb-recommend /group/belle2/users/tenchini/prerelease-05-00-00a/charged/charged_eph3_BGx0_0.root
The results are presented in one line separated by spaces. Pick the tag starting with analysis_tools
and assign
it to b2.conditions.globaltags
.
NOTE: This variable always takes a list of tags.
Solution
The correct global tag is analysis_tools_release-04-02
Include it in the steering file like this:
b2.conditions.prepend_globaltag("analysis_tools_release-04-02")
Configuring the FEI¶
Now that all the prerequisites are there, we have to configure the FEI for our purposes. To do this,
we need to configure two objects:
The fei.get_default_channels
function and the fei.FeiConfiguration
object.
The fei.get_default_channels
function controls which channels the FEI reconstructs. Disabling channels speeds up the FEI
so it makes sense to only select what you need by specifying the appropriate arguments.
As only charged B mesons are reconstructed in this exercise, the chargedB
argument has to be set to True (default)
and the neutralB
argument to False.
The same applies to the hadronic
and semileptonic
arguments, set hadronic=True
and semileptonic=False
as you will only reconstruct B mesons in hadronic decay channels.
You should also enable B meson decay channels involving baryons with the baryonic=True
argument as this increases
efficiency.
Exercise
Configure fei.get_default_channels
as described above and assign it to a variable.
Solution
particles = fei.get_default_channels(
chargedB=True,
neutralB=False,
hadronic=True,
semileptonic=False,
baryonic=True,
)
The fei.FeiConfiguration
class controls the other configuration options of the FEI.
Here, the FEI monitoring should be disabled with the appropriate argument (monitor=False
) as we are not interested in
the internal performance characteristics of the FEI stages.
We also have to specify the FEI prefix argument here. This prefix allows distinguishing between different trainings
in a single Global Tag and is prefix=FEIv4_2020_MC13_release_04_01_01
for the current central training.
Exercise
Configure fei.FeiConfiguration
as described above and assign it to a variable.
Solution
# Set up FEI configuration specifying the FEI prefix
configuration = fei.FeiConfiguration(
prefix="FEIv4_2020_MC13_release_04_01_01", monitor=False
)
# Get FEI path
The configuration created above must now be turned into a basf2
path which can be appended to the main path.
This is done with the fei.get_path
function which takes the channel configuration
and the general FEI configuration as arguments and returns a FeiState
object.
The path
attribute of this newly-created FeiState
(e.g. feistate.path
) is then appended
to the main path with the basf2.Path.add_path
method.
Exercise
Create the FEI path with fei.get_path()
and use its basf2.Path.add_path
method to add it to your main path.
Hint
The syntax is mainpath.add_path(feipath)
.
Solution
# Get FEI path
feistate = fei.get_path(particles, configuration)
# Add FEI path to the path to be processed
main.add_path(feistate.path)
You have now successfully added the FEI to the main path. The FEI will add a particle list
to the datastore called B+:generic
. In addition to the usual variables, the B meson candidates in the particle list
will also have two extraInfo
variables set:
The extraInfo(decayModeID)
and the extraInfo(SignalProbability)
variables. The first one specifies the decay
channel in which the B meson has been reconstructed, the second one is the output of the B meson classifier. This value
can be used to select B meson candidates to which the FEI assigns a higher probability.
Final Steps¶
What remains now is adding Monte Carlo matching and creating variable aliases for the extraInfo
s
created by the FEI. Then, you can write the B+:generic
list to a .root
file.
You should already be familiar with these topics from the previous exercises.
Exercise
Add MC matching to the B+:generic
particle list and create variable aliases
for extraInfo(decayModeID)
and extraInfo(SignalProbability)
.
Then, write out the B+:generic
particle list to a root
file.
Interesting variables are Mbc
, deltaE
,
extraInfo(decayModeID)
, extraInfo(SignalProbability)
and isSignal
(or their aliases).
Finally, start the event loop with a call to basf2.process
.
Hint
Go back to First steering file to see the step-by-step instructions on how to add MC matching, write the ntuple and start the event loop.
Aliases are introduced in Various additions, check there if you are unsure how to use them.
Solution
ma.matchMCTruth(list_name="B+:generic", path=main)
vm.addAlias("SigProb", "extraInfo(SignalProbability)")
vm.addAlias("decayModeID", "extraInfo(decayModeID)")
# Store tag-side variables of interest.
ma.variablesToNtuple(
"B+:generic",
[
"Mbc",
"deltaE",
"mcErrors",
"SigProb",
"decayModeID",
"isSignal",
],
filename="B_charged_hadronic.root",
path=main,
)
The FEI returns not only one B meson candidate for each event but up to 20. Using the modularAnalysis.rankByHighest
function, it is possible to rank the candidates by the B meson classifier output in the
extraInfo(SignalProbability)
variable. This is optional but often useful to select the best, i.e. most likely correct,
candidate.
Exercise (optional)
Use rankByHighest
to rank the B meson candidates in the B+:generic
list by the
extraInfo(SignalProbability)
variable. Write the rank to a new variable called FEIProbabilityRank
.
Don’t forget to create an alias for this variable (within an extraInfo
metavariable) and write this to the
nTuple.
Hint
You should already be familiar with Best Candidate Selection from the Various additions lesson.
The documentation on rankByHighest
can be found here: modularAnalysis.rankByHighest
.
If the outputVariable
argument of modularAnalysis.rankByHighest
is called FEIProbabilityRank
,
the alias should be created for extraInfo(FEIProbabilityRank)
.
Solution
# Rank B+ candidates by signal classifier output
ma.rankByHighest(
particleList="B+:generic",
variable="extraInfo(SignalProbability)",
outputVariable="FEIProbabilityRank",
path=main,
)
vm.addAlias("FEIProbRank", "extraInfo(FEIProbabilityRank)")
vm.addAlias("SigProb", "extraInfo(SignalProbability)")
vm.addAlias("decayModeID", "extraInfo(decayModeID)")
# Store tag-side variables of interest.
ma.variablesToNtuple(
"B+:generic",
[
"Mbc",
"deltaE",
"mcErrors",
"SigProb",
"decayModeID",
"FEIProbRank",
"isSignal",
],
filename="B_charged_hadronic.root",
path=main,
)
You can now execute your steering file which should look somewhat like this:
Final steering file
#!/usr/bin/env python3
import sys
import basf2 as b2
import fei
import modularAnalysis as ma
from variables import variables as vm
# get input file number from the command line
filenumber = sys.argv[1]
# create path
main = b2.Path()
# load input data from mdst/udst file
ma.inputMdst(
environmentType="default",
filename=b2.find_file(f"starterkit/2021/1111540100_eph3_BGx0_{filenumber}.root", "examples"),
path=main,
)
# Add the database with the classifier weight files for the FEI
# You can use the command b2conditionsdb-recommend
b2.conditions.prepend_globaltag("analysis_tools_release-04-02")
# Get FEI default channels.
# Utilise the arguments to toggle on and off certain channels
particles = fei.get_default_channels(
chargedB=True,
neutralB=False,
hadronic=True,
semileptonic=False,
baryonic=True,
)
# Set up FEI configuration specifying the FEI prefix
configuration = fei.FeiConfiguration(
prefix="FEIv4_2020_MC13_release_04_01_01", monitor=False
)
# Get FEI path
feistate = fei.get_path(particles, configuration)
# Add FEI path to the path to be processed
main.add_path(feistate.path)
# Add MC matching when applying to MC.
# This is required for variables like isSignal and mcErrors below
ma.matchMCTruth(list_name="B+:generic", path=main)
# Rank B+ candidates by signal classifier output
ma.rankByHighest(
particleList="B+:generic",
variable="extraInfo(SignalProbability)",
outputVariable="FEIProbabilityRank",
path=main,
)
vm.addAlias("FEIProbRank", "extraInfo(FEIProbabilityRank)")
vm.addAlias("SigProb", "extraInfo(SignalProbability)")
vm.addAlias("decayModeID", "extraInfo(decayModeID)")
# Store tag-side variables of interest.
ma.variablesToNtuple(
"B+:generic",
[
"Mbc",
"deltaE",
"mcErrors",
"SigProb",
"decayModeID",
"FEIProbRank",
"isSignal",
],
filename="B_charged_hadronic.root",
path=main,
)
# Process events
b2.process(main)
print(b2.statistics)
Offline analysis¶
Now that you have created your ntuple, we can have a look at the properties of the B mesons we have created.
You have already looked at the beam-constrained mass Mbc
in First steering file.
For correctly reconstructed B mesons, this variable should peak at the B meson mass. It is therefore a good
indicator for the quality of the B mesons we have reconstructed.
Exercise
Load your ntuple file into python, either using root_pandas
or uproot
.
Then, plot the distribution of Mbc
from 5.15 – 5.3 GeV.
You should see broad peak with a sharp drop-off below 5.2 GeV. This drop-off is caused by a fixed pre-cut in the FEI. Candidates below this threshold are rejected before classification as they are almost always incorrect.
Solution
# Include this only if running in a Jupyter notebook
%matplotlib inline
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
from root_pandas import read_root
df = read_root('B_charged_hadronic.root')
fig, ax = plt.subplots()
n, bins, patches = ax.hist(df['Mbc'], bins=30, range=(5.15, 5.3))
ax.set_xlabel(r'$\mathrm{M}_{\mathrm{bc}}$ in GeV/c^2')
ax.set_ylabel('Number of candidates')
fig.savefig('m_bc.pdf')
Question
The distribution of Mbc
you have just plotted doesn’t peak at the B meson mass of 5.28 GeV. Can you explain this?
Solution
We haven’t really used the classifier output of the FEI yet. The up to 20 candidates in each event are selected by FEI Signal Probability but many still have low absolute classifier values and by definition almost all of them are misreconstructed.
Exercise
Increase the signal purity by requiring minimum values of extraInfo__boSignalProbability__bc
. Try cuts at 0.001,
0.01 and 0.1!
You can also try selecting the candidate with the highest FEI Probability in each event by using the
extraInfo__boFEIProbabilityRank__bc
variable created with modularAnalysis.rankByHighest
(if you have done this).
These selections should increase the purity of the B meson candidates under consideration and lead to a sharper peak at the B mass.
You can also have a look at the correctly reconstructed B mesons by requiring isSignal == 1
. By comparing this
to the cuts on the FEI classifier you can see how well the FEI identifies correctly reconstructed B mesons.
Solution
# Include this only if running in a Jupyter notebook
%matplotlib inline
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
from root_pandas import read_root
df = read_root('B_charged_hadronic.root')
fig, ax = plt.subplots()
# If you didn't do the optional exercise, the 'FEIProbRank' column won't be there.
# Just remove this part of the query in this case.
sig_prob_cut_df = df.query('(SigProb > 0.01)
& (FEIProbRank == 1)')
n, bins, patches = ax.hist(sig_prob_cut_df['Mbc'], bins=30, range=(5.15, 5.3))
ax.set_xlabel(r'$\mathrm{M}_{\mathrm{bc}}$ in GeV/c^2')
ax.set_ylabel('Total number of candidates')
ax.set_title('SigProb > 0.01')
fig.savefig('m_bc_cut_0_01.pdf')
Congratulations, you have now discovered the B meson in Monte Carlo data! This concludes the first part of this lesson. The second part of this lesson will show you now how to use the reconstructed Btag in you own analysis.
Reconstructing the full ϒ(4S) event¶
In this part of the lesson, we will reconstruct the full ϒ(4S) event using the FEI. The B0 decay process we will be looking at is the semileptonic decay to a charged pion, a muon and a muon neutrino.
The FEI skim¶
You might have noticed that applying the FEI takes some time, even for the small file we have just processed. For this reason and to save computing resources, datasets with pre-applied FEI tagging exist. These preprocessed datasets are called skims.
We will be using a FEI-skimmed file in this exercise in which the B0:generic
particle list already exists.
If you would like to know more about skimming, you can have a look into Skimming.
The input file we will be using, found at /home/belle2/mbauer/fei_tutorial/fei_skimmed_xulnu.udst.root
, only
contains decays of B0 mesons to a light lepton and a charged pi or rho meson. This way we don’t have to process
as much data as we would have to for a file containing decays in all B decay channels.
Prerequisites (part 2)¶
Lets get started with the usual steps. Nothing here should be new to you.
Exercise
Start a new steering file.
In this file, you won’t need the fei
package so you can skip this import.
Create a path and load the udst file
/home/belle2/mbauer/fei_tutorial/fei_skimmed_xulnu.udst.root
.
NOTE: You can still use modularAnalysis.inputMdst
to do this, even though it’s a udst
file.
Then, fill two particle lists with muons and charged pions. For the muons, you can require a muonID
above 0.9, for the pions a pionID
above 0.5.
For both you should apply some requirements on the track, you can use
dr < 0.5 and abs(dz) < 2 and nCDCHits > 20 and thetaInCDCAcceptance
Hint
You should already be familiar with this from First steering file.
Solution
#!/usr/bin/env python3
import basf2 as b2
import modularAnalysis as ma
from variables import variables as vm
main = b2.Path()
ma.inputMdst(
"default",
b2.find_file("starterkit/2021/fei_skimmed_xulnu.udst.root", "examples"),
path=main,
)
good_track = (
"dr < 0.5 and abs(dz) < 2 and nCDCHits > 20 and thetaInCDCAcceptance"
)
ma.fillParticleList("mu-", "muonID > 0.9 and " + good_track, path=main)
ma.fillParticleList("pi-", "pionID > 0.5 and " + good_track, path=main)
ϒ(4S) Reconstruction¶
Now, let’s get started with the reconstruction. We will first create the signal B meson, then combine it with the B meson provided by the FEI to get the ϒ(4S).
As the semileptonic decay we are analysing contains a neutrino, a few things have to be considered.
The neutrino is not used the reconstruction of the Bsig as it can’t be seen in the Belle II detector.
This leads to a discrepancy between the simulated decay and the reconstructed decay,
causing the isSignal
variable to always be zero.
To solve this you can tell the MC matching algorithm to accept missing neutrinos by using the ?nu
flag,
similiar to the ?addbrems
flag introduced in Various additions.
Just add this flag to the end of the decay string in modularAnalysis.reconstructDecay
. 1
Exercise
Reconstruct a B0 meson particle list called B0:signal
from a positive pion and a muon.
Add the ?nu
flag as described above.
Solution
ma.reconstructDecay("B0:signal -> pi- mu+ ?nu", cut="", path=main)
So far, we have not used the FEI. Now, we will use the Btag in the udst file and combine it with the Bsig we have just created.
Exercise
Combine the B0:generic
from the udst file with the
anti-B0:signal
to a list called Upsilon(4S):opposite_cp
.
NOTE: The B0:generic
should come first in the decay string, otherwise
the missing mass squared variable we’re using later won’t know which of the B mesons
is the tag and which is the signal.
Can you think of a reason for the opposite_cp
identifier of the Upsilon(4S)
list?
Have we forgotten something?
Hint
Think of special properties of B0 mesons compared to B+ mesons.
For the implementation: You will most likely need one more modularAnalysis.reconstructDecay
to create the second particle list and the modularAnalysis.copyLists
function to combine both lists.
Solution
To account for B0 meson mixing, you should also combine same-sign B0 mesons as the anti-B0 can oscillate to a B0.
ma.reconstructDecay(
"Upsilon(4S):opposite_cp -> B0:generic anti-B0:signal", cut="", path=main
)
ma.reconstructDecay(
decayString="Upsilon(4S):same_cp -> B0:generic B0:signal",
cut="",
path=main,
)
# Combine the two Upsilon(4S) lists to one. Note: Duplicates are removed.
ma.copyLists(
outputListName="Upsilon(4S)",
inputListNames=["Upsilon(4S):opposite_cp", "Upsilon(4S):same_cp"],
path=main,
)
Now that we have reconstructed the full ϒ(4S), we will create a Rest of Event. You have already done this in The Rest of Event (ROE) for a B meson, here however we will create a Rest of Event for the ϒ(4S). This allows us to count the tracks left over after reconstructing the ϒ(4S), for two correctly reconstructed B mesons there should be no tracks left over.
For this to work we have to use a slightly different ROE mask than in the ROE chapter. To match the cuts used by the
FEI to reconstruct Btag candidates, we have to tighten the cut on dr
to below 2 and the cut on the absolute
value of dz
(abs(dz)
) to below 4. The two other cuts (on pt
and thetaInCDCAcceptance
) can be left as-is.
Exercise
Create a Rest of Event for the Upsilon(4S)
list. Then, append an ROE mask using the cuts introduced in the
chapter The Rest of Event (ROE) and the additional track cuts mentioned above.
Hint
The track cuts should be thetaInCDCAcceptance and pt > 0.075 and dr < 2 and abs(dz) < 4
and the ecl cuts
thetaInCDCAcceptance and E > 0.05
.
To create the ROE, use modularAnalysis.buildRestOfEvent
.
To append the ROE mask, use modularAnalysis.appendROEMasks
.
Solution
ma.buildRestOfEvent("Upsilon(4S)", path=main)
track_based_cuts = "thetaInCDCAcceptance and pt > 0.075 and dr < 2 and abs(dz) < 4"
ecl_based_cuts = "thetaInCDCAcceptance and E > 0.05"
roe_mask = ("my_mask", track_based_cuts, ecl_based_cuts)
ma.appendROEMasks("Upsilon(4S)", [roe_mask], path=main)
Writing out the nTuple¶
We are now ready to add MC matching and write out the nTuple.
While the MC matching is applied to the Upsilon(4S)
list, you can also access the daughter’s truth variables using
the daughter
metavariable.
This is especially useful in FEI analyses:
As you might have noticed in the first part of the exercise, the number of perfectly (i.e. isSignal == 1.0
)
reconstructed Btag mesons is not very large As we are only really
interested in the Bsig, the isSignal
variable of this B meson can be a better signal
definition than the isSignal
variable of the Upsilon(4S)
In addition to the properties of the B mesons, we can now also use information from the full event.
An example here is the missing mass squared in the variable m2RecoilSignalSide
.
This quantity should peak at zero for decays in which only one neutrino is missing and thus provides high
separating power in (semi-)leptonic analyses.
There are different implementations of the missing mass squared in basf2, this version uses the explicit
Btag momentum (here reconstructed by the FEI) and has therefore a high resolution.
A second variable with high separating power is the number of additional charged tracks introduced above.
This variable is called nROE_Charged
in basf2. It needs the ROE mask name defined above as an argument in brackets.
Exercise
Add MC matching for the Upsilon(4S)
to your path.
Write the Upsilon(4S) particle list to an nTuple. Include the variables used in the first part of the lesson, the signal variables mentioned above (both for the Bsig and the ϒ(4S)), the missing mass squared and the number of additional tracks.
It is recommended to define aliases for the variables as otherwise the variables will be long and unwieldy in your offline analysis.
Finally, don’t forget to process the path!
Hint
If you have forgotten how to use aliases: This is introduced in Various additions.
If you have adapted the solution given here, the variable containing the number of additional tracks
will be nROE_Charged(my_mask)
.
Solution
ma.matchMCTruth(list_name="Upsilon(4S)", path=main)
vm.addAlias("Btag_SigProb", "daughter(0, extraInfo(SignalProbability))")
vm.addAlias("Btag_decayModeID", "daughter(0, extraInfo(decayModeID))")
vm.addAlias("Btag_Mbc", "daughter(0, Mbc)")
vm.addAlias("Bsig_isSignal",
"daughter(1, isSignal)")
vm.addAlias("nCharged", "nROE_Charged(my_mask)")
ma.variablesToNtuple(
"Upsilon(4S)",
variables=[
"Btag_SigProb",
"Btag_decayModeID",
"Btag_Mbc",
"Bsig_isSignal",
"isSignal",
"m2RecoilSignalSide",
"nCharged"
],
filename='Upsilon4S.root',
path=main,
)
# Process events
b2.process(main)
You can now execute your steering file which should look somewhat like this:
Final steering file
#!/usr/bin/env python3
import basf2 as b2
import modularAnalysis as ma
from variables import variables as vm
main = b2.Path()
ma.inputMdst(
"default",
b2.find_file("starterkit/2021/fei_skimmed_xulnu.udst.root", "examples"),
path=main,
)
good_track = (
"dr < 0.5 and abs(dz) < 2 and nCDCHits > 20 and thetaInCDCAcceptance"
)
ma.fillParticleList("mu-", "muonID > 0.9 and " + good_track, path=main)
ma.fillParticleList("pi-", "pionID > 0.5 and " + good_track, path=main)
ma.reconstructDecay("B0:signal -> pi- mu+ ?nu", cut="", path=main)
ma.reconstructDecay(
"Upsilon(4S):opposite_cp -> B0:generic anti-B0:signal", cut="", path=main
)
ma.reconstructDecay(
decayString="Upsilon(4S):same_cp -> B0:generic B0:signal",
cut="",
path=main,
)
# Combine the two Upsilon(4S) lists to one. Note: Duplicates are removed.
ma.copyLists(
outputListName="Upsilon(4S)",
inputListNames=["Upsilon(4S):opposite_cp", "Upsilon(4S):same_cp"],
path=main,
)
ma.buildRestOfEvent("Upsilon(4S)", path=main)
track_based_cuts = "thetaInCDCAcceptance and pt > 0.075 and dr < 2 and abs(dz) < 4"
ecl_based_cuts = "thetaInCDCAcceptance and E > 0.05"
roe_mask = ("my_mask", track_based_cuts, ecl_based_cuts)
ma.appendROEMasks("Upsilon(4S)", [roe_mask], path=main)
ma.matchMCTruth(list_name="Upsilon(4S)", path=main)
vm.addAlias("Btag_SigProb", "daughter(0, extraInfo(SignalProbability))")
vm.addAlias("Btag_decayModeID", "daughter(0, extraInfo(decayModeID))")
vm.addAlias("Btag_Mbc", "daughter(0, Mbc)")
vm.addAlias("Bsig_isSignal",
"daughter(1, isSignal)")
vm.addAlias("nCharged", "nROE_Charged(my_mask)")
ma.variablesToNtuple(
"Upsilon(4S)",
variables=[
"Btag_SigProb",
"Btag_decayModeID",
"Btag_Mbc",
"Bsig_isSignal",
"isSignal",
"m2RecoilSignalSide",
"nCharged"
],
filename='Upsilon4S.root',
path=main,
)
# Process events
b2.process(main)
print(b2.statistics)
Offline analysis (part 2)¶
Like in the first part of this lesson, you can now analyse your nTuple. As before, you can use the FEI signal
probability (now under the alias Btag_SigProb
if you have adapted the example) to select more pure
ϒ(4S) candidates and plot m2RecoilSignalSide
for different values of the classifier.
You can also see how cuts on the number of additional tracks change the histogram.
NOTE: A histogram of Mbc
will look quite different in this part of the exercise,
this is because in the last exercise we have used a generic MC sample and in this exercise we are using
an MC sample with only four decay channels.
Exercise
Plot m2RecoilSignalSide
for Bsig_isSignal == 1.0
to see what well-reconstructed B -> pi l nu decays should
look like.
Then, plot m2RecoilSignalSide
for different cuts on the FEI classifier output. See also how the shape of
m2RecoilSignalSide
changes when requiring zero additional tracks.
Solution
# Include this only if running in a Jupyter notebook
%matplotlib inline
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
from root_pandas import read_root
df = read_root('Upsilon4S.root')
fig, ax = plt.subplots()
# Requiring only the B_sig to be correctly reconstructed.
# Try what happens if you require the whole Y(4S) to be correct!
signal_df = df.query('(Bsig_isSignal == 1.0)')
n, bins, patches = ax.hist(signal_df['m2RecoilSignalSide'], bins=30, range=(-2, 5))
ax.set_xlabel(r'$\mathrm{M}_{\mathrm{bc}}$ in GeV/c^2')
ax.set_ylabel('Total number of candidates')
ax.set_title('Bsig_isSignal == 1')
fig.savefig('m2RSS_Signal.pdf')
fig, ax = plt.subplots()
# This is just an example cut, you can try without the cut on nCharged
# and for different values on BtagSigProb
cut_df = df.query('(Btag_SigProb > 0.01) & (nCharged == 0.0)')
n, bins, patches = ax.hist(cut_df['m2RecoilSignalSide'], bins=30, range=(-2, 5))
ax.set_xlabel(r'$\mathrm{M}_{\mathrm{bc}}$ in GeV/c^2')
ax.set_ylabel('Total number of candidates')
ax.set_title('SigProb > 0.01')
fig.savefig('m2RSS_FEIcut_0_01_nCharged_0.pdf')
Congratulations, you now know how to run the FEI and how to use it in your analysis. If you would like to know more you can always read the extensive documentation of the FEI. Here you can also find instructions on how to train the FEI and explanations on the code structure.
Key points
Get the weight files from the conditions database
Add the FEI to your path with
fei.get_default_channels
andfei.FeiConfiguration
.FEI Purity and efficiency are controlled by a cut on
extraInfo(SignalProbability)
The Btag from the FEI can be used to construct a complete ϒ(4S) event.
Stuck? We can help!
If you get stuck or have any questions to the online book material, the #starterkit-workshop channel in our chat is full of nice people who will provide fast help.
Refer to Collaborative Tools. for other places to get help if you have specific or detailed questions about your own analysis.
Improving things!
If you know how to do it, we recommend you to report bugs and other requests
with JIRA. Make sure to use the
documentation-training
component of the Belle II Software
project.
If you just want to give very quick feedback, use the last box “Quick feedback”.
Please make sure to be as precise as possible to make it easier for us to fix things! So for example:
typos (where?)
missing bits of information (what?)
bugs (what did you do? what goes wrong?)
too hard exercises (which one?)
etc.
If you are familiar with git and want to create your first pull request for the software, take a look at How to contribute. We’d be happy to have you on the team!
Quick feedback!
Author of this lesson
Moritz Bauer
Footnotes
- 1
Alternatively, you can also use the
isSignalAcceptMissingNeutrino
variable instead ofisSignal
but we will be going with the?nu
flag andisSignal
in our example.