3.4.5. Flavor tagging#

How can we distinguish between a \(B^0\) and a \(\bar B^0\)? This is not as simple as the case where we have a \(B^+\) vs a \(B^-\) and can just consider the charge of the particles. Yet determining this “flavor” of the \(B\) meson is crucial to look into CP violation.

This is where the Flavor Tagger comes in. Used in an analysis, where we have reconstructed a signal \(B_\text{sig}\), the Flavor Tagger looks at the ROE of the \(B_\text{sig}\) (i.e. at the \(B_\text{tag}\)) and applies machine learning techniques (also called multivariate analysis) to determine the flavor of the \(B_\text{tag}\). In this lesson we will not train this model ourselves, but rather use pre-computed weights. So where do we get them?

Luckily, such sets of weights are contained in the conditions database. That means that we only need to use a specific global tag (if you forgot what that is, consult this page again: Conditions Database Overview).

Exercise

Add a line to your previous steering file that adds the latest global tag. For this you need to call the prepend_globaltag method of the basf2.conditions object (which is an instance of the ConditionsConfiguration class). To get the latest analysis global tag, you can call modularAnalysis.getAnalysisGlobaltag.

Solution

Simply add this to the top of your steering file:

# set analysis global tag (needed for flavor tagging) [S10]
b2.conditions.prepend_globaltag(ma.getAnalysisGlobaltag())  # [E10]

Good! Now we have the weights and we have already created the ROE, so we can start right away!

Exercise

Call the flavorTagger.flavorTagger function (you need to specify your path and your particle list).

Solution

Remember to import the module:

import flavorTagger as ft  # [S23|E23]

and call the function:

# call flavor tagging [S20]
ft.flavorTagger(["B0"], path=main)  # [E20]

Exercise

Add the the flavorTagger.flavor_tagging variable collection to your output variables

Solution

b_vars += ft.flavor_tagging  # [S43|E43]

Exercise

Run your steering file!

Solution

This is the full steering file at this point:

#!/usr/bin/env python3

import sys
import basf2 as b2
import modularAnalysis as ma
import stdV0s
import flavorTagger as ft  # [S23|E23]
from variables import variables as vm  # shorthand for VariableManager
import variables.collections as vc
import variables.utils as vu

# get input file number from the command line
filenumber = sys.argv[1]

# set analysis global tag (needed for flavor tagging) [S10]
b2.conditions.prepend_globaltag(ma.getAnalysisGlobaltag())  # [E10]

# create path
main = b2.Path()

# load input data from mdst/udst file
ma.inputMdstList(
    filelist=[b2.find_file(f"starterkit/2021/1111540100_eph3_BGx0_{filenumber}.root", "examples")],
    path=main,
)

# fill final state particle lists
ma.fillParticleList(
    "e+:uncorrected",
    "electronID > 0.1 and dr < 0.5 and abs(dz) < 2 and thetaInCDCAcceptance",
    path=main,
)
stdV0s.stdKshorts(path=main)

# apply Bremsstrahlung correction to electrons
vm.addAlias(
    "goodFWDGamma", "passesCut(clusterReg == 1 and clusterE > 0.075)"
)
vm.addAlias(
    "goodBRLGamma", "passesCut(clusterReg == 2 and clusterE > 0.05)"
)
vm.addAlias(
    "goodBWDGamma", "passesCut(clusterReg == 3 and clusterE > 0.1)"
)
vm.addAlias(
    "goodGamma", "passesCut(goodFWDGamma or goodBRLGamma or goodBWDGamma)"
)
ma.fillParticleList("gamma:brems", "goodGamma", path=main)
ma.correctBrems("e+:corrected", "e+:uncorrected", "gamma:brems", path=main)
vm.addAlias("isBremsCorrected", "extraInfo(bremsCorrected)")

# combine final state particles to form composite particles
ma.reconstructDecay(
    "J/psi:ee -> e+:corrected e-:corrected ?addbrems",
    cut="abs(dM) < 0.11",
    path=main,
)

# combine J/psi and KS candidates to form B0 candidates
ma.reconstructDecay(
    "B0 -> J/psi:ee K_S0:merged",
    cut="Mbc > 5.2 and abs(deltaE) < 0.15",
    path=main,
)

# match reconstructed with MC particles
ma.matchMCTruth("B0", path=main)

# build the rest of the event
ma.buildRestOfEvent("B0", fillWithMostLikely=True, path=main)
track_based_cuts = "thetaInCDCAcceptance and pt > 0.075 and dr < 5 and abs(dz) < 10"
ecl_based_cuts = "thetaInCDCAcceptance and E > 0.05"
roe_mask = ("my_mask", track_based_cuts, ecl_based_cuts)
ma.appendROEMasks("B0", [roe_mask], path=main)

# call flavor tagging [S20]
ft.flavorTagger(["B0"], path=main)  # [E20]

# perform best candidate selection
b2.set_random_seed("Belle II StarterKit")
ma.rankByHighest("B0", variable="random", numBest=1, path=main)

# Create list of variables to save into the output file
b_vars = []

standard_vars = vc.kinematics + vc.mc_kinematics + vc.mc_truth
b_vars += vc.deltae_mbc
b_vars += standard_vars

# ROE variables
roe_kinematics = ["roeE()", "roeM()", "roeP()", "roeMbc()", "roeDeltae()"]
roe_multiplicities = [
    "nROE_Charged()",
    "nROE_Photons()",
    "nROE_NeutralHadrons()",
]
b_vars += roe_kinematics + roe_multiplicities
# Let's also add a version of the ROE variables that includes the mask:
for roe_variable in roe_kinematics + roe_multiplicities:
    # e.g. instead of 'roeE()' (no mask) we want 'roeE(my_mask)'
    roe_variable_with_mask = roe_variable.replace("()", "(my_mask)")
    b_vars.append(roe_variable_with_mask)

b_vars += ft.flavor_tagging  # [S43|E43]

# Variables for final states (electrons, positrons, pions)
fs_vars = vc.pid + vc.track + vc.track_hits + standard_vars
b_vars += vu.create_aliases_for_selected(
    fs_vars + ["isBremsCorrected"],
    "B0 -> [J/psi -> ^e+ ^e-] K_S0",
    prefix=["ep", "em"],
)
b_vars += vu.create_aliases_for_selected(
    fs_vars, "B0 -> J/psi [K_S0 -> ^pi+ ^pi-]", prefix=["pip", "pim"]
)
# Variables for J/Psi, KS
jpsi_ks_vars = vc.inv_mass + standard_vars
b_vars += vu.create_aliases_for_selected(jpsi_ks_vars, "B0 -> ^J/psi ^K_S0")
# Add the J/Psi mass calculated with uncorrected electrons:
vm.addAlias(
    "Jpsi_M_uncorrected", "daughter(0, daughterCombination(M,0:0,1:0))"
)
b_vars += ["Jpsi_M_uncorrected"]
# Also add kinematic variables boosted to the center of mass frame (CMS)
# for all particles
cmskinematics = vu.create_aliases(
    vc.kinematics, "useCMSFrame({variable})", "CMS"
)
b_vars += vu.create_aliases_for_selected(
    cmskinematics, "^B0 -> [^J/psi -> ^e+ ^e-] [^K_S0 -> ^pi+ ^pi-]"
)

vm.addAlias(
    "withBremsCorrection",
    "passesCut(passesCut(ep_isBremsCorrected == 1) or passesCut(em_isBremsCorrected == 1))",
)
b_vars += ["withBremsCorrection"]

# Save variables to an output file (ntuple)
ma.variablesToNtuple(
    "B0",
    variables=b_vars,
    filename="Bd2JpsiKS.root",
    treename="tree",
    path=main,
)

# Start the event loop (actually start processing things)
b2.process(main)

# print out the summary
print(b2.statistics)

Good! Now let’s talk about the output of the flavor tagger. This is the value \(q\cdot r\), where \(q=-1\) corresponds to a \(\bar B^0\) and \(q=+1\) to \(B^0\). \(r\) is called the dilution factor. It’s 0 if the algorighm can’t decide between both options for \(q\) and 1 if the algorithm is certain about it’s decision.

The variable FBDT_qrCombined is the \(q\cdot r\) result of one of the models of the Flavor Tagger (a fast boosted decision tree). It can also be NaN to signal that not a single charged track in the ROE was found, so that the algorithm can’t work.

Note

In releases before release-05, a value of \(\pm 2\) was used instead of NaN.

Part of the variables you just added was also qrMC for the “true” (MC level) flavor of the \(B_\text{tag}\). It can take the numbers \(\pm 1\), as well as 0 (no flavor defined in the MC) and \(\pm 2\) (some problems with MC matching in the ROE).

That means that we can check how well our flavor tagger performed by comparing it to FBDT_qrCombined!

Exercise (optional)

Plot a histogram of FBDT_qrCombined and qrMC.

Exercise

Only consider candidates with clearly defined MC level flavor tag. Compare the output of qrMC to that of FBDT_qrCombined.

Hint

For clearly defined MC flavor tag, you only have to distinguish between qrMC == 0 and qrMC == 1. For these two cases you can then plot the distribution of FBDT_qrCombined.

Solution

##########################################################################
# basf2 (Belle II Analysis Software Framework)                           #
# Author: The Belle II Collaboration                                     #
#                                                                        #
# See git log for contributors and copyright holders.                    #
# This file is licensed under LGPL-3.0, see LICENSE.md.                  #
##########################################################################
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import uproot


plt.style.use("belle2")

df = uproot.open("Bd2JpsiKS.root:tree").arrays(['qrMC', 'FBDT_qrCombined'], library='pd')

fig, ax = plt.subplots()
ax.hist(
    df.query("qrMC == -1.")["FBDT_qrCombined"],
    histtype="step",
    linewidth=1.5,
    label=r"True $\bar B^0$",
    bins=30,
)
ax.hist(
    df.query("qrMC == 1.")["FBDT_qrCombined"],
    histtype="step",
    linewidth=1.5,
    label=r"True $B^0$",
    bins=30,
)
ax.set_xlabel("FBDT_qrCombined")
ax.legend()
fig.savefig("flavor_tags.svg")

MC vs reconstructed flavor tag — Fig. 3.25 MC flavor tag vs flavor tag from FBDT#

You can clearly see that the flavor tagger is by no means perfect, but definitely allows to do better than just guessing!

Key points

The flavor tagger is used to discriminate between \(B_\text{tag}^0\) and \(\bar B_\text{tag}^0\)
The output is of the form \(\pm 1\) times the confidence between 0 and 1.

Stuck? We can help!

If you get stuck or have any questions to the online book material, the #starterkit-workshop channel in our chat is full of nice people who will provide fast help.

Refer to Collaborative Tools. for other places to get help if you have specific or detailed questions about your own analysis.

Improving things!

If you know how to do it, we recommend you to report bugs and other requests with GitLab. Make sure to use the documentation-training label of the basf2 project.

If you just want to give very quick feedback, use the last box “Quick feedback”.

Please make sure to be as precise as possible to make it easier for us to fix things! So for example:

typos (where?)
missing bits of information (what?)
bugs (what did you do? what goes wrong?)
too hard exercises (which one?)
etc.

If you are familiar with git and want to create your first merge request for the software, take a look at How to contribute. We’d be happy to have you on the team!

Quick feedback!

Authors of this lesson

Kilian Lieret

basf2 light-2405-quaxo documentation

Flavor tagging

3.4.5. Flavor tagging#